<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS feeds suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shyzer.com/2007/01/05/rss-feeds-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shyzer.com/2007/01/05/rss-feeds-suck/</link>
	<description>The one and only blog about Shyzer and Goob.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goob</title>
		<link>http://www.shyzer.com/2007/01/05/rss-feeds-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-5743</link>
		<dc:creator>Goob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shyzer.com/2007/01/05/rss-feeds-suck/#comment-5743</guid>
		<description>600 feeds? If each feed were to be updated daily, would you read them all? I&#039;m on the computer a goof 7 hours a day and even I don&#039;t come anywhere close to having 600 different sites I&#039;m interested in on a daily basis.

Anybody can take the extreme end of the spectrum to prove a point. However, you&#039;d be hard pressed to find many other users who have 600 legitimate sites they are interested in reading every time an update occurs. 

There&#039;s a reason RSS feeds have yet to catch on with mainstream Internet users. Most people don&#039;t have hundreds of sites they need to be updated on and can easily check their few favorites without having to rely on a silly feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>600 feeds? If each feed were to be updated daily, would you read them all? I&#8217;m on the computer a goof 7 hours a day and even I don&#8217;t come anywhere close to having 600 different sites I&#8217;m interested in on a daily basis.</p>
<p>Anybody can take the extreme end of the spectrum to prove a point. However, you&#8217;d be hard pressed to find many other users who have 600 legitimate sites they are interested in reading every time an update occurs. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason RSS feeds have yet to catch on with mainstream Internet users. Most people don&#8217;t have hundreds of sites they need to be updated on and can easily check their few favorites without having to rely on a silly feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lee Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.shyzer.com/2007/01/05/rss-feeds-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-5742</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lee Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shyzer.com/2007/01/05/rss-feeds-suck/#comment-5742</guid>
		<description>I subscribe to over 600 feeds. Do you know how long it would take for me to update myself if I were to use a browser? And that&#039;s just if I would want to be updated once a day.

As for only having the first sentence of your post in your feed, a lot of blogging platforms allow one to include the full entry in a feed if it is desired. Many bloggers opt to do that these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I subscribe to over 600 feeds. Do you know how long it would take for me to update myself if I were to use a browser? And that&#8217;s just if I would want to be updated once a day.</p>
<p>As for only having the first sentence of your post in your feed, a lot of blogging platforms allow one to include the full entry in a feed if it is desired. Many bloggers opt to do that these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
